🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.